PDA

View Full Version : 2vs2 or Lone Wolves



PGL
12-16-2007, 08:26 PM
Ok guys I have gotten interest from both sides here, there have been a few double team guys that came up to me and asked for that and then lone wolves for the other....... another option is both but the time schedule will be very tight on it and would be tough to do.......... so if you can go into lone wolves please click that option, if its possible to get a double team together click that option...... if you would go into both please click away....

The Next tournament will have all LW, 2v2 and 4v4 .....

PGL

.MeThoD
12-16-2007, 11:49 PM
As I said in the other thread I think having just 4v4 and 2v2 would be the best option right now for the opener. It keeps things simple, and you will most likely get just as much interest in the 2v2 (hopefully).

I know some people we're hoping for an FFA tournament but I say waiting a bit would be best. FFA is a lot of luck, no i'm not saying this because I don't like it or i'm bad at it but you can't deny that luck plays a much bigger part in FFA than team games. Also right now the maps aren't very great for FFA and it just doesn't feel like it works too well [right now].

I think that if you waited until the next event it could be a lot better. I don't think you are going to lose a lot of people because of no Lone Wolves event at this first tourney but if you give it some time to develop then you could work it into the following events because it's not a horrible idea and it would work well a little later on.

PGL
12-17-2007, 12:00 AM
yea the only reason i changed it was because I could see lots of individuals playing for a larger sum rather than splitting it two ways but if you guys want the 2vs2 back in thats not a problem at all...... i personally like 2vs2 more but was after the one that would gernate more registration and success..... thanks for the input Method

PGL

.MeThoD
12-17-2007, 12:06 AM
Yeah thats just my opinion, I'd rather play in the 2v2 (and 4v4) right now. I think FFA would work well, just not at the first event because of the options you have at this time.

Apocalypto
12-18-2007, 07:53 PM
yeah im with eric on this one, best option is 4v4 & 2v2 but man its ur call really either way im comin to F.s.U haha figure that one out lol ok newayz... umm email me if u need help i also work for the canadian navy so i can ask them for sponsorship support

email;

hemi69_8@hotmail.com

Urban Fighter
12-18-2007, 09:33 PM
2v2 would be good and it's more still than FFA I feel. But you should make timers shorter on maps to stop camping.

PGL
12-18-2007, 09:37 PM
it does sound like the 2vs2 is making a comeback...... I'll do some figuring on this here fellas

PGL

Urban Fighter
12-18-2007, 09:40 PM
I'd still say FFA because the main event is 4v4 right and FFA has always been there with 4v4 Also it let's a player with a bad team shine.

CheekyMonkey13
12-23-2007, 05:45 PM
FFA Please!

CheekyMonkey13
12-23-2007, 05:50 PM
I have to agree with whoever said it lets a good player on a bad team shine, and potentially find him/herself a team, not to mention there already is a team event taking place. Personally, the FFA is the event I'm absolutly dying to play in, especially because one of my 4v4 teammates might be unable to attend. But both double team and FFA would also be great. Please keep FFA in so I have an event to rock :p

By the way, if say six people vote for double team, that will prehaps only result in 3 teams, I just felt the need to point this out because it didn't occur to me immediatley.

Epikon
12-29-2007, 11:36 AM
I would def like 2v2 over ffa, like what has already been pointed out ffa just hasn't been balanced yet. I think it could be good after some forge maps are made and things are tweaked but I already have a doubles partner and I know he won't join an FFA. As for me I am unsure.